So we'll take a look at the performance profile you’ll see in workstation graphics scenarios with this new Quadro board versus the rest of its workstation-class competition. NVIDIA's "G92-GL / G92-875" is the heart and soul of the QuadroFX 3700Īs with all Workstation class, professional certified cards, the QuadroFX 3700’s price tag is about $1,500 higher than its consumer counterpart, GeForce 8800 GT 512 MB.
We'll make and effort to prove this theory out in the pages ahead.
#Nvidia quadro fx 1500 open gl series
Likewise, with NVIDIA's G92 GL GPU underneath this professional-grade QuadroFX should also deliver substantially better performance in high-end OpenGL applications, while tackling DirectX 10 performance similarly to the 8800 series GPU as well. This card is based on NVIDIA’s popular new G92 graphics processor, which has been prominently featured in their GeForce 8800 GT/GTS lineup at a very competitive price point. This card has an MSRP of about $1,700, which is smack-dab in between the price tags of their mid-range and ultra-high-end product lineups, although street prices are much lower. With that in mind, today we'll take a look at NVIDIA’s entry to this market, the QuadroFX 3700. Buyers in this range likely want to make sure they’re getting solid performance, but have a reasonable budget in mind. Cards in this price range would be expected to handle high-end tasks with relative ease, but aren't required to post absolute top-notch performance or feature huge frame buffer memory on board. The fact that there were no suitable options in the market for the $1,000 - $2,500 price range was a problem which would eventually be solved, and we’re finally starting to see workstation graphics cards finally coming to market in this price range. However, once you start pricing these cards out, you’ll soon realize that there is a huge, gaping hole in the price spectrums of each respective competitive product offering.ĪTI and NVIDIA sell their high-end (V8650/5600) cards for $2,500+, while mid-range cards sell for anywhere from $1,000 and under. NVIDIA is typically stronger on the high-end, whereas ATI’s cards are winning in the mid-range it was pretty cut and dry. In our prior tests, we found performance to be exceptionally close between comparatively priced products from AMD/ATI’s and NVIDIA’s high-end and mid-range cards. Hovering over the value, you can get individual results.Earlier this year, we conducted a series of reports on both the high-end and mid-range workstation graphics card markets with a range of comparative tests. The value depicts the average frame rate. The interpolation in the same category is not possible.
Uncertain – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. Uncertain – The graphics card testing has revealed a slower card might ensure a high and stable frame rate. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.
May Run Fluently – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being.
#Nvidia quadro fx 1500 open gl driver
We tried uninstalling the driver and reinstalling: same result. Graphics Card: Nvidia Quadro FX 1400 Driver: 9136. As per interpolation of the similar graphics cards showing low frame rates, the game is possible to lag.įluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 25 fps or more.įluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 35 fps or more.įluent – In considering all graphics benchmarks, the game speed is likely to be 58 fps or more. Switching to openGL' In inv appl options we activated Direct3D because the Inventor graphics website indicates that there are problems with the openGL. May Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being. Stutter – How graphics cards operate in the game is being examined for the time being.